SES Toronto 2009

Contact me for SEO London Ontario.

I am en route to the second day of Search Engine Strategies (SES) 2009. I will be live-blogging my attendance, and I will be attending the following sessions:

  • Analytics for Search: ROI, Engagement & Attribution
  • Information Architecture
  • Paid Search Quality Scoring: 201, 301
  • How to Speak Geek: Working Collaboratively with your IT Department to Get Things Done

I will be adding to my blog throughout the day as I attend sessions, so please check back often to learn more.

KEYNOTE Emmanuel Rosen – Anatomy of Buzz

  • buzz – person to person- increase positive communication
  • old way – see ads and they buy
  • Endnote – 40%/60% heard by word of mouth
  • send mac user a coupon that they can pass on to friend – stimulus for buzz (20% coupons redeemed
  • Ben & Jerry’s free cone day > few days before in 2008 > gift for friends > w/in 11 hours 250,000 fb users, ½ million fb users w/in 24 hours > hard to measure
  • MAKE IT EASY AND FUN
  • 73% buzz offline, 17% phone, 10% online
  • 63% of buzz is positive
  • category we talk about most – FOOD
  • visual buzz – observing others using products – ie. Lunchables, Soup At Hand, Listerine pocket packs
  • CREATE VISUAL BUZZ
  • main value for Adidas on myspace – people seeing their friends associated with brand
  • we imitate some and dis-imitate others – if “geek” is wearing it I don’t want it (Live Strong
  • why trigger buzz?
  • 30% of negative buzz comes from people who have never owned the product
  • people forget to create buzz – give them opportunities to talk
  • GIVE US SOMETHING TO TALK ABOUT
  • Will it Blend – blend an iphone came from users > got email that they blended upon their request – feeling of ownership (George Wright)
  • PAY ATTENTION TO DISPERSION > just because there is talk in observers, does not mean that there is buzz volume > want buzz across heterogeneous communities
  • TELL A GOOD STORY – stimulate customers to tell stories about brand – Tom’s Shoes Shoe Drop – social media with purpose
  • MASS MEDIA BUILDS BUZZ TOO – not only the domain of guerilla/grassroots
  • 17% of brand conversations refer to advertising
  • ads can simulate or stimulate buzz
  • WORK WITH HUBS – some people talk more than others – some people just have greater mass of communication, experts
  • SIMULTANOUS INITIATIVES – several initiatives some will work, most will not
  • measuring word of mouth? Scout Labs

ROI, Analytics

Brian

  • using data to make changes online -quickly – using kpis
  • always be testing – continuous approval process
  • 3 key resources for success – people, tools,
  • we need to stop focus on engagement – focus on money in the bank – if there is no money then who cares?

June Li – Turning Data into Dollars – ClickInsight

  • data & reports – ask questions – segmentation analysis – take action
  • we make data meaningful – not the tools
  • DESIGN – get invited to design party – not after the fact – be upfront when goals are being set
  • segmentation – what is the difference between those that convert and don’t convert? – how does these differ in their interaction with the site
  • are there sources that drive more, are there keywords that drive more, are there times, places where there is more interaction
  • segment according to what you will take action on

Anne-Marie – Search Query Audits – Outrider

  • offsite search result – targeting goes awry
  • broad match keywords – target more than what actually applies – more clicks but are they the right clicks? irrelevant clicks
  • negative keywords – for clicks where this does not apply, use negative keywords
  • hidden defect search result
  • organic v. paid > paid 12% clicks, 96% of spend > harder to demonstrate value for organic search
  • monitor value – eliminate noise through segmentation
  • calculate potential > formula provided on slide
  • localization – just give you have links does not mean you will rank locally, you need local links

Information Architecture

  • interface after info architecture
  • keyword based information architecture > taxonomy
  • tested without content > once you can navigate with content
  • no time wasted on orienting oneself > immediately can know where to go
  • no marketing speak, technical jargon > use the language of the user
  • define goals, come up with info architecture, taxonomy and usability testing then design
  • linking gone wild – do not put links all over page > consistently
  • page interlinking – internal links within site – horizontal and vertical linking
  • url structure does not have impact on ranking – but it should be useful for users
  • come up with taxonomy, page interlinking supplements taxonmy, come up with interface
  • server performance – this comes last – can search crawl and inde
  • how do you know if your site is doing what it should – analytics
  • silo information into specific types of traffic
  • steady or lower traffic, new competitors, search query changes all signal time to change website
  • what do users need, how they are searching, and what the spider needs – leverage the se to create new site
  • spiders urls to index, links to content, content to rank
  • rich media can coexist with seo if it makes sense for the user too
  • link juice – link popularity > all pages of domain “need to be touched”
  • noindex – will stop it from being indexed regardless of whether it is linked to… robots.txt won’t do this
  • rel=”nofollow”
  • 301 redirection – one way that is authorized to pass link juice
  • canonicalization tag- put tag in page that shows what the actual url should be – band-aid – new about 1 year – it does transfer link juice but not across domains (like 301 but when it is on the same domain
  • xenu – spiders site and gives you info to sift through and order differently (free) and of course Google webmaster

Paid search QUALITY SCORE 201, 301

  • adwords 1.0 – cpm but few tools
  • overture cpc ads
  • modestly monetized query – white space
  • from no ads to many > seems like similar query – ie. multi-channel marketing to multichannel marketing
  • adwords 2.5 – disincetivise lowball bidding on irrelevant terms, chase away annoying advertisers, address relevancy and quality with more than CTR > low quality meant inactive keywords or raise bid above min.
  • 2.6 landing page quality – user response, editorial approaches automated, landing page load time > won’t be penalized for landing page quality (you don’t have to optimize each landing page
  • information scent – good categorization, tight relationship of menaing
  • multiple signals will alert google of poor quality score – automated – incorrect targeting, bad guys
  • landing pages/website issues are binary
  • basic build problems – wrong campaign settings,no ad testing, jumbled ad groups, keywords
  • Quasi arbitrage
  • careless start – broad keywords, high bids to rescue account with polluted QS > start completely new account with proper account build
  • higher ad positions better click prices
  • strong brand – clear goals – head start
  • conventional business value
  • query ambiguity requires extra patience

quality scores – david sprinkle

  • known factors – CTR, query relevance, landing page quality, account history, geographical performance, maximum bid, bounce rate
  • smart campaign architecture – small focused ad groups, kill non-performing keywords, pause ads, don’t edit, separate top performers, match types
  • negatives
  • landing page – keyword reinforcement, SEO 101, privacy/contact/T&C, load times, site-related keyword tool
  • URL redirects within sites – use actual domain, 301s preferred, maintain URL parameters, changes may take weeks to register
  • bid management – utilize available reports, create your own metrics, only use current data, give changes time
  • load page in under 5 seconds
  • YSLOW for firebug
  • yahoo and msn focus on CTR and CPC, ad relevance, landing pages very literal, more literal than Google

HOW TO SPEAK GEEK – WORK COLLABORATIVELY WITH IT DEPT (what a fun session to attend at the end of the day!)

  • cost of bad communication – bad blood with IT – MONEY
  • business critical – digital is leading
  • outsourcing – communication required
  • when bad it is really bad
  • no reason to avoid communication – IT will be glad you went first
  • the new language is only cold at first
  • there will never be a day where and IT are true equals
  • praise the machine – engineers are the last to be praised
  • personalize relationships – what drives them, what makes them tick when not writing code
  • admit you don’t know – builds credibility, pretending hurts everyone, focus on what you need and what you know
  • find IT who know business and design
  • you will need warriors on FIERY FRIDAYS > builds respect
  • mutual vision of success and integration
  • manage expectations
  • speak the same language > ask the right questions (be specific)

Popularity: 12% [?]

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • email
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg

5 Responses to SES Toronto 2009

  1. Thanks for posting, I’ll definitely be subscribing to your blog.

  2. I only want to say thanks for all the great info found on your blog, even helped me with my work recently :) keep it up!

  3. I just wanted to thank you very much for this illuminating article. I have already bookmarked your site, when I have more free time I am going to have to do some further reading. Well back to my dreaming of Panama or back to the books – I wonder which one is going to win out. :)

  4. Pingback: Keyword Bid Tool

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>