Category Archives: Editorials

I Had No Choice But Buy an iPad

I am sure a few people will roll their eyes when I tell them I finally bought an iPad but all I can say is I had no choice. Literally, there are no other viable options presenting themselves and though I hear promises of late 2010 or early 2011 nothing seems to pan out. As a customer, I had reached the point that, despite my loyalty to other brands and my general dislike for how Apple does business, I needed a product that was not being offered elsewhere and I had to ‘cross over to the other side’. I had really been banking on the Microsoft Courier – but that fell apart. What does this mean for the brands I usually buy? Since I am loving the iPad it does not bode well. Though I will still need other devices, I am no longer monogamous. From now on my relationship status is “It’s complicated”.

Fittingly posted from my iPad.

Popularity: 11% [?]

Groupon: The Great Business Model That Can’t Last

I am not knocking the idea of Groupon – it is a great idea and a great company that has dealt well with hiccups along the road. As a concept, Groupon is a real life provider of promotions marketing using the power of social, which is a constant struggle for businesses. While companies are starting to get the hang of brand management and caving to the advent of social customer relationship management, promoting goods and services in a way that keeps true to the “spirit” of social media is a different ball game entirely and an area where a lot of companies fall short despite major efforts and investment.

I don’t wonder why Yahoo wanted to buy them, they have so little. And Google – well they are like Eric Cartman’s Trapper Keeper after it absorbs Rosie O’Donnell – not ugly like that, it just rolls around collecting everything around it and then the thing just disappears. But they could not sway Groupon who seemingly have it all under control. Then again, can it really last?

The competition is fierce, copycats are appearing and maybe the biggest threat of them all I could see – wouldn’t this be better achieved by reaching out to already existing loyal customers and fans online, give them the opportunity to share this opportunity with their networks on platforms that are already familiar. Without Groupon. I see this a far better solution and it will solve two problems I see with the Groupon model:

  1. Most people will not trust this site. Plain and simple – it will never fly. Right now there is a buzz, but unless they feature only the most reputable businesses or align themselves with a recognizable leader in online shopping, they are doomed to be a fad. Generally, I try to think of everyone in my large extended family – if none of them would use it probably not that big of a deal in the grand scheme of things.
  2. Can they scale as they grow? I see it difficult to maintain not only the quality of the offers that are provided on the site as the reach their tipping point, nor can I see them being able to provide the same exposure as more businesses jump on the bandwagon.

I am sure that there are lots of naysayers out there, and I don’t want to be a spoilsport. I think this is a great way to socialize promotions online, but I would rather see businesses doing this for existing customers and fans who will reward them for the offer by raising awareness and with increased loyalty rather than show up once and never come again. Not that Groupon does not allow it, but at the end of the day did you get the deal from Groupon or the business? Will you go back to Groupon to find more deals or back to the business to be a loyal customer? So who does this benefit?

Popularity: 13% [?]

A Word To Women In Tech

Listening to the TC Disrupt conference at my desk seemed like a good idea – get my work done all the while listening to what some great minds can come up with when they all sit down and talk. And it was a good idea – until the train wreck happened and by train wreck I mean the Women In Tech discussion. All smart women and I am sure each had their own reasons for some of the things that were said, but WTF!

First, what I think they failed to realize is that this is not a women in tech issue – it’s been an issue for women since we decided to leave the home for work, and then when we decided we wanted to be something other than a nurse, maid or secretary. It seemed kind of silly to argue about tech news coverage for women and how to increase the ratio of women in technology careers if you consider how hard women have it in, for example, any type of military career. Not to imply these things are not issues, but are they really that upsetting to the point of boiling over? Why do women in technology careers, whether they have computer engineering degrees, work in digital marketing, or own tech companies, think their lot is different? The work is different but the cause and symptoms of the inequality is not.

In addition, though there was a resounding consensus that a “Women in Tech” panel was unproductive, whether they were unwilling to bear the burden or not, they did represent the rest of “Women in Tech” and could have taken the opportunity to present the reasons why a) girls should want to become women in tech and b) why tech companies should want to hire more women. They could have highlighted some of the great things that are coming from women in tech. They could have shone, and for all women in tech. Instead there was an awkward squabble. If they did not want to do it, they should have left it to women who would have taken advantage of the opportunity.

True, being marginalized is sometimes upsetting, but while something might seem initially unproductive I think women (especially those representing the rest of us) need to take these opportunities where they can be had to our advantage. And avoid at all costs being counter-productive by getting angry that the opportunities are so few.

Next time, scrap the Women in Tech panel for a Women in Technology Education panel.

Popularity: 12% [?]