Tag Archives: Google

Finding The Value In Google Buzz

When Google Wave came out I did not post anything because I really had nothing to say – like everyone I was excited to get my invite, but after signing up and feeling like I was part of a super exclusive club. Like most everyone else, I was disappointed at how few people there were on Google Wave and did not like the interface – it was pointless and really nothing very innovative. It was like a forum about anything that you could not browse. I just did not get it.

But now they have unleashed upon the world Google Buzz – integrated with Gmail and available via mobile, it allows for threaded discussions with no word or character limit, following other users and linking to other accounts such as Twitter.

Already, Google Buzz has been the source of some criticism. From the discussions on Google Buzz about Google Buzz these appear to be the main criticisms of the platform:

  • There were major privacy concerns at the beginning – anyone could follow anyone to view anything, which were alleged to cause some real life problems.
  • Do we need another way to dialog with people online or is this just another way for web geeks to talk to other web geeks?
  • Not everyone uses Gmail so adoption rates will be slow – is Google Buzz compelling enough to get yet another email address?
  • The threads get too long and there is character limit – you have to read through hundreds of sometimes long comments just to make sure you are not repeating something.

Google Buzz did not get the usual long testing and beta phase – it was tested internally by Google employees and individuals brought in to test at the Google offices. Likely Google wanted to move quickly to make up for the anti-climax that was Google Wave, but some say they were not ready.

Despite this, according to Google as of a few days ago they have already had 9 million posts and comments. I would wonder if that figure includes the tweets from Twitter integration, not to mention the other platforms that can be added to Buzz. Twitter is getting more than 25 million tweets daily last I heard, so 9 million in about a week is nominal if tweets are included. It figures that there will be a lot of traffic at the outset as well, as early adopters will spend a great deal of time testing out the new platform.

The big questions are: do we need another way to communicate online and does Google Buzz serve a purpose that other platforms such as Twitter and Facebook cannot. Pete Cashmore put it really way in his post for CNN.com: where Twitter is the town square and Facebook is the local bar, Google Buzz is the campus.

Built for inquiry, learning and collaboration, if Google refines the ability to form private groups this could become a valuable tool for small companies and academic circles – I can see how Google Buzz could mean easy dialog on problems to find solutions with a few more additions the offering. While Google might want it to be so much more than that, which I can tell from their video, nonetheless there is a need that is met with Google Buzz that cannot be found on Twitter or Facebook, or even in email.

How are you using Google Buzz, if at all, and do you think Google Buzz has any enduring qualities? If so, how do you see the value of Google Buzz?

Popularity: 7% [?]

Goo.gl & Fb.me Are Amateurs, Bit.ly Goes Pro

Both Google and Facebook revealed today, to the shock and titillation of many online observers, that they are now offering their own url shortening services. Goo.gl and Fb.me respectively will be used for Google products and on Facebook to shorten links. Fb.me is already being seeing on Twitter.

Bit.ly has responded by unveiling their Pro service today, which is already in beta for many larger online publishers such as the Huffington Post, The New York imes, The Onion, TechCrunch, to name a few. So does Bit.ly have much to worry about now? I think that TechCrunch said it well following their post about Bit.ly being fu.kd, Goo.gl and Fb.me can suck.it.

bitly-fish

Bit.ly accounts for one third of the links on Twitter and while fb.me and goo.gl will of course gain some of the market share, I think this will just be as a result of more people using url shorteners rather than because they will stop using bit.ly.

The statistics offered on Bit.ly and now enhanced in the new Pro accounts, leaves bit.ly with very little to worry about from this new competition. Furthermore, both url shorteners are limited to their own platforms, bit.ly integrates easily with many applications. It seems very premature to speak of Bit.ly’s demise, especially when they are gearing up for growth with some of the biggest names in online publishing.

Popularity: 4% [?]

Is Microsoft Bing the Next Avril Lavigne?

Microsoft Bing, this company’s latest foray into the search world, might be less innovative then it is purported to be.

First there is the recent attention given to the similarities of Kayak, a travel search engine and Bing’s own travel search feature were, according to Wired Magazine, “uncomfortably close”. Whitney Burke, director of Bing, has denied Kayak’s claims. “We are discussing the matter with Kayak,” she said. “Bing Travel is based on independent development by Microsoft and Farecast.com, which Microsoft acquired in 2008. Any contrary allegations are without merit.” It is the use of the sliders that are on the Kayak site that are the primary dispute.

kayak_vs_bing2

Then there is Hakia and their claims that the categories feature is mightily similar to their own galleries, which is part of what made their search engine so unique. Hakia been in early partnership talks with Microsoft in July, and their COO told reporters: “We were approached by Microsoft to show them how the hakia galleries worked, and we did, and now they have a similar feature — we showed them how to do it,” she said. “We were surprised that it is a featured part of and the most differentiated part of Bing.”

bingobama1

The issue here is not that these search engines “look similar”, it is that Microsoft may have possibly co-opted the semantic technologies and artificial intelligence of these other engines. But, at the end of the day, a vast majority of what is on the web has been pirated in some shape or form and can Microsoft really be held accountable for this?

Popularity: 2% [?]

Every social networking site + Google vs facebook

They all knew that there was no competing with facebook under the current circumstances. So now all the social networking sites have teamed up together (imagine those meetings!) and have created OpenSocial, a set of common APIs for developing social applications. According to Google:

The OpenSocial standards are designed to evolve through contribution from the open source community and as new features are developed by various partners. Global members of the OpenSocial community include Engage.com, Friendster, hi5, Hyves, imeem, LinkedIn, Ning, Oracle, orkut, Plaxo, Salesforce.com, Six Apart, Tianji, Viadeo, and XING.

This was unofficially reported by TechCrunch on Oct 30, but it was not until today that Google made its official press announcement.

OpenSocial is really being marketed to developers – it does not require a special markup language and it is much more flexible than the facebook applications which only have functionality on the canvas page – the widget on the profile is generally useless and non functional. This is very exciting for developers, but I don’t think that this poses any kind of threat to the facebook platform and community. There are too many users already, and there will not be a mass migration anytime soon. While developers now have great opportunity, and marketers have another place to put their branded apps, facebook will grow and grow because they did it first. And the average user does not really care about markup language and flexibility (!). Furthermore, I have no doubt that eventually facebook will join OpenSocial to benefit its users and developers.

Supposedly on Nov 1 the OpenSocial API info for developers can be found here, but still not live when this was written.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Learning about Google PR from Freddy Kreuger

Google PRThe recent “crisis” over the Google PR loss of many websites and blogs has caused many SEOs and bloggers alike to question the real value and accuracy of PR (though many in the SEO and SEM industries and otherwise have been thinking this for a long time). Some major sites have had their PR “fixed” (because elitism always enhances the user experience, and this is the point, right?) but many smaller sites are left wondering: WTF?

I have long believed that Google PR means nothing. Most users do not know what Google PR is and so it does not increase the likelihood that people will want to visit your site again if you have a good PR ranking. None of the major blogs that lost PR will lose traffic, and it is for that reason that links on these sites are so valuable – they have referring power.

But why is PR so important still? Even though SEOs hate it and SEOs don’t respect it, why do SEOs talk about it, and why do SEOs get upset when they lose it?

In Freddy vs. Jason, Freddy Kreuger’s weakness is that he only has power so long as people believe in him.

Remind you of something?

It’s only real so long as SEOs endorse it, so long as SEOs believe in it and so long as SEOs include it among the goals to achieve. Furthermore, it is not up to Google to get rid of the green bar… it is up to the search marketing and optimization industry at large. It is up to the people buying links and selling links to find a new set of determinants on which to base the value of their web real estate. If we stop believing in Google PR, Google PR will cease to have value. And then Google can do what they want to PR and the fact that Matt Cutts was not a buddy would no longer be an issue for smaller webmasters that were hurt by this.

Funny personal things that I noticed during the PR update:

  • 1 expired domain purchased in the spring lost PR then regained PR3 after this update – a few PR0 links for this site in the interim but no linkbuilding for this site
  • 1 expired domain purchased in the spring lost PR and was redirected to another site – after the update I checked the PR and it has PR4, a few links built (4-5 links) – I un-redirected this to check and it indeed has PR4 even though it had PR0 when it was redirected to the other domain
  • a friend’s blog has PR4 some links built to this domain, but not over 50 – most links to this were changed when he moved to a new domain

Popularity: 1% [?]